http://paulpowered.com/2010/06/blown-call-and-the-baseball-purist/ A Blog... Powered by Paul Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:11:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://paulpowered.com/2010/06/blown-call-and-the-baseball-purist/comment-page-1/#comment-390 Paul Martinez Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:36:25 +0000 http://paulpowered.com/?p=401#comment-390 Thanks Jay. I am inclined to agree that he will not. Also, it would probably take some time to see if any other record setting games fell within the same criteria and would have to be reversed as well. I could see that setting up a landslide of additional controversy. I am looking forward to seeing how this is handled. Thanks Jay. I am inclined to agree that he will not. Also, it would probably take some time to see if any other record setting games fell within the same criteria and would have to be reversed as well. I could see that setting up a landslide of additional controversy. I am looking forward to seeing how this is handled.

]]> http://paulpowered.com/2010/06/blown-call-and-the-baseball-purist/comment-page-1/#comment-389 Tweets that mention My thoughts on the blown call on the perfect game that never was: #mlb #tigers -- Topsy.com Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:33:44 +0000 http://paulpowered.com/?p=401#comment-389 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jay Thompson, Paul Martinez. Paul Martinez said: My thoughts on the blown call on the perfect game that never was: http://bit.ly/d8ZYVi #mlb #tigers [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jay Thompson, Paul Martinez. Paul Martinez said: My thoughts on the blown call on the perfect game that never was: http://bit.ly/d8ZYVi #mlb #tigers [...]

]]> http://paulpowered.com/2010/06/blown-call-and-the-baseball-purist/comment-page-1/#comment-388 Jay Thompson Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:31:09 +0000 http://paulpowered.com/?p=401#comment-388 Spot on Paul. I don't think Selig will reverse the call because (somewhat understandably) he's worried about setting a precedent. But with all of your criteria met, that concern would be muted. Spot on Paul. I don’t think Selig will reverse the call because (somewhat understandably) he’s worried about setting a precedent. But with all of your criteria met, that concern would be muted.

]]>